gdahl @ 2008-09-24 15:13
Does it stack with RI? (different school)
|
lonewolf2k7 @ 2008-09-24 20:19
bloody hope so
|
remeX @ 2008-09-27 15:33
Thats AC buff, so should stack =)
|
houserocker @ 2008-09-27 17:30
180 evades is a huge gain in a single patch. Grats to MAs :)
|
prenoud @ 2008-10-04 10:10
yeah this is lub... anyone have 3k static evades yet?
|
prenoud @ 2008-10-17 02:06
I read the comment before this one, and I was just about to explain to them why they're retarded, then i realized I wrote it! WTF dont do drugs kids... srsly oO
|
Threeze @ 2008-11-21 09:44
i dont get why this has to have a runspeed debuff on it... i don't play ma, but i dont see why it's necessary, lol
|
Heltfeil @ 2008-12-14 23:00
Cause its in AC line, and stack with any other evade buff ingame. At least thats the reason they felt it was necessary.
|
PaPaPOThead @ 2008-12-24 16:13
sucks u have to lose 70 str also.. gonna nerf up the ar some
|
Blasky @ 2009-01-01 17:39
Using one of the online Trickledown calculators, the -70 Str counteracts the +30 Agility so we don't actually lose any MA skill by using this over our other AC buffs. Granted, we are going to lose some (11 I think) Brawling, but as far as I can see that's a decent tradeoff for 180 evades.
|
gimpmasta @ 2009-05-01 01:13
Lol so much for AC buff, now you get +60 evades and 30 agi for -70 strength and -900 Ac.
|
Binarybot @ 2009-12-09 21:57
Considered a speed buff now, should no longer stack wtih RI (has a higher stacking order). So much for +300 evades.
|
gdahl @ 2010-09-15 15:26
As this is a speed stuff now, 220 MAs should prolly stick to Stutter Step (if you can cast), as it adds way more evades than this. Elude Step and even Shuffle Step is better at 220 (2k evades).
This nano should've remained AC line imo.
|
| Post a comment |
|
You are not logged in. Anonymous users can not post comments.Please log in to continue. |
