18.8.62 | Live servers: 18.8.62

Item Database - Nano Crystal (NT: Enfraam's Surprise Assault)

Nano Crystal (NT: Enfraam's Surprise Assault) Icon #12257 Nano Crystal - The target will be hit for 3750 - 4850 points of radiation damage, 3 seconds after landing. This nano will pierce any reflect shields that the enemy has active.
Flags Visible, Modified Description, Tell Collision, Has Energy
Can Carry, Use, Eat
Patch 17.0 18.8.53
Change QL:
Value 7310
Energy 1
Mass 0.1kg
To Use User Expansion sets & Lost Eden and
User Profession == Nano-Technician and
User Matter creation >= 1545 and
User Level >= 207 and
User Cyberdeck & Izgimmer modified
On Use User Upload Enfraam's Surprise Assault  
Ninjamancer @ 2006-12-14 04:48
wow, can you say onenuke Alpha? Good thing you cant attack Players with it lol...
LotusEnfo @ 2006-12-14 05:46
Then NT's could experience the ownage of the pre damage cap Agent AS :P
Shadow.ik @ 2006-12-14 19:19
Who said you can't attack plls with it? New Nemesis nano
Shadow.ik @ 2006-12-14 19:34
Hmm I see ....damn...this nano would rock!
Whitey @ 2006-12-15 13:13
you can attack pets with this, i think.
Gavyyn @ 2007-02-21 18:12
Izgrimmers triple.....yeah ....right um.....Good thing you cant attack Players with it lol.......

regsvr32 @ 2007-07-31 16:46
i really dont wona think about the genral in ai hoo mama what a dmg but i get aggro lol easily
regsvr32 @ 2007-08-07 12:14
arrrgh just discover from text shown above if ppls read this nuke can be used once in 30 min this is make the le nukes totaly nerf
regsvr32 @ 2007-08-07 12:14
nvm delete it
slitheris @ 2007-09-15 08:18
Why does this do more damage than Izzi's triple?

mahdi007 @ 2007-09-21 10:45
sad thing is it just barely brings NTs up to par with DD.. level locked.. at 219.. and with a hell of a lot more effort than "l,m"
donger @ 2007-10-16 13:29
Its a pvm nuke, so it does more damage
Dalek @ 2007-11-03 03:20
For everyone unclear, this is a PVM only nuke, you cannot cast it on players, thats why it does more damage than Izgimmers Triple.

Sadly though it has the 'balancing' recharge time of its PVP counterpart, meaning it does less DPM than Izgimmers Ultimatum. No reason to get this nano at all.
Yakobo66 @ 2007-11-16 11:22
they should really lower recharge to at least 3s :|
vengeance636 @ 2008-02-29 02:41
Agreed, the Recharge is Pathetic for a PvM nuke :\
Dollcet @ 2008-09-19 04:31
Well recharge is pretty bad but its faster to cast on full deff than IU
Binarybot @ 2009-02-18 02:06
Finally, Enfraam gets to 1-up Izzy, and the ICC slaps his hands for it.

I agree, though... since this is more for pvm, lower the recharge. 3 IU is 9 seconds, this is 8 seconds. IU is 300 more dps at min damage. Even lowering the recharge to 5 seconds would up the DPS to be only 108 less than IU. With a recharge of 5.5, it would actually outdamage IU in dps by 7 dps.
Post a comment
You are not logged in. Anonymous users can not post comments.Please log in to continue.