Auno.org: 18.8.62 | Live servers: 18.8.62

Item Database - Surviving Waist Symbiant, Support Unit Aban

Surviving Waist Symbiant, Support Unit Aban Icon #215193 Slowly bubbling, this Symbiant is an age old living creature created with Spirit-Tech. It once resided in one of the Ancient Inhabitants of the Shadowlands.
Note: This 'Symbiant' can be installed like an Implant. Use an Implant Enabler (found in shops) to install it.
[SPECIAL]
Flags Visible, Has Multiple Count
Can Carry, Wear
Patch 15.0.5 15.8
QL
150
Change QL:
Type Implant
Slot Waist
Value 500
Mass 0.95kg
Requirements
To Equip User Profession == Trader or
User Profession == Adventurer or
User Profession == Meta-Physicist or
User Profession == Martial Artist or
User Profession == Keeper or
User Profession == Doctor or
User Profession == Fixer and
User Treatment >= 892 and
User Level >= 110 and
User Strength >= 339 and
User Agility >= 339 and
User Sense >= 339 and
User Expansion sets & Shadowlands
Effects
On Equip User Modify Max health 181  
User Modify Agility 16  
User Modify Stamina 16  
User Modify Projectile AC 151  
User Modify Melee AC 226  
User Modify Energy AC 151  
User Modify Chemical AC 376  
User Modify Radiation AC 376  
User Modify Cold AC 376  
User Modify Fire AC 376  
User Modify Biological metamorphosis 31  
User Modify Nano pool 31  
User Modify Nano cost modifier -5  
Comments
Ransomnia @ 2008-08-07 06:35
How QL150 symbiant have -5% nanocost modifier when
QL200 implant have -2% nanocost modifier? any idea or is that bug? Logically could think : higher ql -> bigger effect but this must be funcom logic...
Ransomnia @ 2008-08-07 06:43
Damn wtb edit button :) -> here for example: http://auno.org/ao/db.php?id=176133&ql=200
legionofone @ 2008-10-27 22:03
yeh except... they are totaly different items... ones a symbiant... and the others a implant... cry some more froob
Ats @ 2008-10-28 11:13
lol yea get outta here ya froob
Batojiri @ 2009-04-19 23:08
quit makin fun of froobs dumbasses, we were all once froobs at one point in time.
Bleodemm @ 2010-01-23 02:55
no. we weren't.
Post a comment
You are not logged in. Anonymous users can not post comments.Please log in to continue.