Auno.org: 18.5 | Live servers: 18.6.15 | Test servers:

Item Database - Nano Crystal (Grand Theft Humidity)

Nano Crystal (Grand Theft Humidity) Icon #42450 Nano Crystal - During a meeting with Mehar Izgimmer, the top-ranked trader Tanius Corbinson probed a bit too deeply into the inner workings of humidity extraction. This caused strife between the two, as Izgimmer felt he had been generous enough in aiding the young woman's research into defensive nanotechnology, and the two stopped speaking shortly thereafter. Though the origins of this nano are unclear, many believe it has its roots within that dispute.
This nano program uses the same TheftBot technology that allows traders to virtually "steal" reflects from soldiers. In this case, however, it harshly rips away the target's natural nanobot regeneration, redirecting it to the trader. Though this will work on anyone, Tanius made sure to make it extra-effective against Nanotechnicians. Just as a special "thank you" to Izgimmer.
Flags Visible, Modified Description, Tell Collision, Has Energy
Can Carry, Use, Eat
Patch 17.5 17.6 17.7
QL
189
Change QL:
Value 3495867
Energy 1
Mass 0.1kg
Requirements
To Use User Psychological modifications >= 1099 and
User Time and space >= 1099 and
User Profession == Trader and
User Expansion sets & Shadowlands and
User Level >= 175
Effects
On Use User Upload Grand Theft Humidity  
Comments
Ephyon @ 2007-08-15 08:45
Gotta love this one <3
Klodovik @ 2007-08-20 17:30
Gotta nerf it soon or people gonna quit playing.
Whitey @ 2007-08-29 06:18
Thats what they said about Triples. And NBS. And borrow reflect. Still here? Then i guess people will stay after all....

although IMHO its bugged. the description shows 'this nano harshly rips away the target's natural nanobot regeneration', yet it doesn't only remove natural nanobot regeneration, it puts it into -nano regen, so its actually a huge DISADVANTAGE to have a 2sec nano delta, which most nano-using profs aim to have.

good(ish) idea, badly implemented. Yet again.
regsvr32 @ 2007-10-08 09:42
woaa Just as a special "thank you" to Izgimmer wooa really big one XD
Mohamed @ 2007-10-19 04:31
This should be nerfed
Dalek @ 2007-11-17 21:58
Well, actually, the 200 level lock was put it because its apparently devasting at lower levels, but since higher toons have 2s nanodelta tick, and the effects are the same, its actually worse at tl7.

FC logic for you.
Threeze @ 2007-12-16 01:52
Why is it not Nodrop?
Kahina @ 2007-12-17 11:50
Cause it's a quest reward. Penumbra quest.
Pung @ 2007-12-18 01:52
Haha, i love nt and trader stories.
Klodovik @ 2007-12-26 17:31
- Nano delta part realy deserves to be removed. :)
Shareida @ 2008-02-20 00:33
Klodovik @ 2007-12-26 17:31
- Nano delta part realy deserves to be removed. :)

Klod's trolling deserves to be removed aswell. Get NR. Or just kill the trader. Aint hard.
Deprivator @ 2008-03-21 13:55
NR is broke.

If I could land the original 160% NR check NSD on a NR3 agent 3 times in a row ... ;p
Klodovik @ 2008-04-05 13:52
Shareida, dear sister, this is comparable to spammable, unremovable E-NSD, if one existed. It's wrong in so many ways.
tr33g @ 2008-04-09 01:11
Klodovik @ 2007-12-26 17:31
- Nano delta part realy deserves to be removed. :)

QFT. Insanely overpowered with it.
Dumbarajko @ 2008-04-25 03:58
whats that "user" part of nano??? trader cant be nt or doc or mp O.o i dont get it
Vabla2 @ 2008-05-21 02:48
The "user" part depends on who's your unlucky victim that you landed the nano on :p
Dollcet @ 2008-10-20 08:44
Whoever made this overpowered POS-Nano should get buggered with Tabasco for Lube ...
Shareida @ 2008-11-25 21:55
Klodovik @ 2008-04-05 13:52
Shareida, dear sister, this is comparable to spammable, unremovable E-NSD, if one existed. It's wrong in so many ways.

Sure. If you would get a lockout on that NSD soon as it landed on the target. Then its spammable.
I'd happily have all NT nanos and MP nanos spammable like this.
Klodovik @ 2008-11-27 21:52
Shareida @ 2008-11-25 21:55
Sure. If you would get a lockout on that NSD soon as it landed on the target.

I wouldn't mind, if they removed NSD removal perks and if they change attack/recharge to 1,5 sec each.
alder @ 2008-12-27 00:56
just /afk'ed out of bs a few minutes ago with my doc. fuck it.
Mekh @ 2009-01-11 16:46
alder @ 2008-12-27 00:56

just /afk'ed out of bs a few minutes ago with my doc. fuck it.
-----------------
Only counter that works.... but at least it is 100% effective :)
Bluetavius @ 2009-01-28 17:37
As a trader who uses this on docs, FP docs, NTs, trox advies, and traders if I can live long enough -.- all this really needs to be nerfed is a longer recharge time, and maybe a higher % nano resist check. Its not terribly hard to land but I have to cast it alot... probably because its a 210 trying to cast on 220s in bs though
Bluetavius @ 2009-01-28 17:40
the real nerf that it needs is the fact that I can cast nanobot defense and GTH MYSELF right after... actually makes nanobot defense worth using imo...
Bluetavius @ 2009-01-28 17:43
edit: the fact that I can cast it on myself and get an effect thats better than PNH is wrong enough in pvm
alder @ 2009-05-15 10:26
Mekh @ 2009-01-11 16:46
Only counter that works.... but at least it is 100% effective :)
---
right but it's an act of pure hate.. stupid to say. i'm about to need ~7kvp for some penu doc gloves (teh sense!) and since le missions dont cut it i'll go bs - but i wont afk this time even if its gth-fuck-fest again.
if gth'ed ill simply go apt at my sides spawnpoint - shit on fc's pvp-system.... sorry for the rest of the pvp'ers on my side but i wont play it that way cause its an annoyance beyond all acceptable.
Shareida @ 2009-05-21 04:05
Klodovik @ 2008-04-05 13:52
Shareida, dear sister, this is comparable to spammable, unremovable E-NSD, if one existed. It's wrong in so many ways.

-----

Exists ingame. Called NSD Proc.
fly @ 2009-07-26 00:22
Exists ingame. Called NSD Proc.
--

Good luck firing it with the crappy AR MPs have.
AOmaster @ 2009-08-01 21:35
Shareida @ 2009-05-21 04:05
Exists ingame. Called NSD Proc.

And please tell me how a PROC is SPAMMABLE...hmm?
Binarybot @ 2010-09-28 08:34
This was nerfed hard. Now only takes 15% of targets max pool (and only castable once per minute), then heals their nano +20% when it ends (so at the end of 35 seconds, you have given your enemy +5% nano).

Heals the trader for 150% of their max nano in 15 second (10% per second). Guess its only use is to counter Nanobot Defense's downside.
alesicis @ 2011-01-22 00:35
FC, all we can do is sigh. It would have been easy to nerf it without putting it in the same degree of useless as summon ammo.
Post a comment
You are not logged in. Anonymous users can not post comments.Please log in to continue.

BatMUD