Auno.org: 18.5 | Live servers: 18.8.22 | Test servers:

Item Database - Greater Nanobot Shelter

Greater Nanobot Shelter Icon #39141 Your nanobots will work to absorb a portion of attacks on your person.
Flags Buff Nano
Can Apply Self
Patch 16.4.4 17.7 17.9
QL 126
Crystal Nano Crystal (Greater Nanobot Shelter)
NCU 5
Nanocost 482
School Protection: 809
Duration 30 minutes
Attack time 2s
Recharge time 5s
Range 1 m
Effect icon Icon 39630
Stacking order 350
Requirements
To Use User Expansion sets & Shadowlands and
User Matter metamorphosis >= 598 and
User Matter creation >= 598 and
User Profession == Nano-Technician
Effects
On Use Self Change 659 22  
Self Change 661 110  
if Breed == Nanomage  
Self Change 661 120  
if Breed == Solitus  or
Breed == Opifex  
Self Change 661 130  
if Breed == Atrox  
Comments
Shadow.ik @ 2006-12-14 13:16
Wft is this doing?
danexpan @ 2006-12-28 21:31
it changes ur 661 :P (dunno wtf that is tho)
Archawk @ 2007-02-08 20:13
659 is reflect (22%) and 661 is the ratio of depleting nanobots when hit with damage (ratio is different for each breed, nanomage having the best damage-nano depletion -ratio. Gotten from the new Scheol quests since 17.1.
Rumit @ 2007-02-18 00:16
You should make both quests in Scheol to have a reward

Jobe Scientists: http://www.ao-universe.com/main.php?site=knowledge&link=2&id=270
Knowledge of the Yuttos: http://www.ao-universe.com/main.php?site=knowledge&link=2&id=271
Shadowstrik3 @ 2007-03-25 11:22
Why does FC hate TL3/4 NTs?

I mean cmon, even a froob nt would have the nano skills to cast this at lvl80-90 and with exspansions easily by level 60. Yet they make the quest to get it so dang hard you basicly have to be TL5 to do it.
bartje @ 2007-03-30 00:02
get frands?
Shadowstrik3 @ 2007-03-31 07:42
I like not having to rely on someone else to get things done for me.
Yakobo66 @ 2007-04-18 14:45
hmm... would calms let you solo this at 128ish? :|
Ilikebunnies @ 2007-05-03 18:31
This doesn't stack with the 13% graft.. so it reflects some more (9% more) but depletes your nano supply?
I guess it could free up your "time and space" for another graft or something. If it stacked, that would be more awesome though. I wish it said exactly how it worked / how much is depleted.
Yakobo66 @ 2007-06-22 21:40
ok... cant solo, nerf catas meh lol
Ats @ 2007-06-24 12:01
this also blocks NT pierce reflect nukes too.
Ats @ 2007-06-25 08:29
got this on my 127 nt, pwnage.
regsvr32 @ 2007-08-07 12:21
ats i dunno if u read that but i think after some patches they remove the defensive focus look at the description
lonewolf2k7 @ 2008-07-23 22:52
Is this the nano that helps stop alpha's ??
Shadowstrik3 @ 2008-08-24 17:34
this nano helps reduce alphas lone, Nullity Sphere1/2 stop alphas, Nanobot Guard can stop them too at the cost of your entire nanopool most of the time.
Binarybot @ 2009-02-13 22:02
Better than a graft as you can zone and still have it running as well. I was going to skip the 22% and just do 1 quest for the 20%, then I noticed that this one also depletes less nano as well.

Also consider how much nano its actually stealing from you. At lvl 100, my NT had about 5000 hp. The max this nano would absorb before I die is 1100 (22% of my 5k health), which would drain 1320 nano. Between 2 passive nano regen lines, PNH (self casting at 100 easily), nano delta, and perk nano heals... its unnoticeable. Better to live with a dented nano pool, than be dead with a full one :)
Binarybot @ 2009-02-17 01:43
Tested ingame using lower ql (20%). Results:

Self nuke IEF - 1228 damage
Self nuke IEF w/ Shelter - 983 damage
Self nuke IEF w/ Shelter and Absorb - 834 absorbed, 328 damage (total: 1162 damage)

So, absorbs takes full damage, then the remainder of the damage is reduced by the reflects.
Tarradax @ 2009-02-19 00:02
Just noticed something about this nano. The version that was introduced in patch 17.7 had this nano in the same school as all other reflects, meaning it won't stack with RRFE.
Then the change in version 17.9 made this (And the trader variant) sit in its own nano line... Which in theory means this should now stack with RRFE.
Anyone can confirm/deny?
Sithark @ 2009-05-13 14:13
i know for sure i could not buff nt's with RRFE on my soldier in BS
hellmaker @ 2010-03-20 23:54
I can cast this on my 49 Nt (with Mochem ofc)
Scabadus @ 2010-08-11 16:16
Given that the quest has a minimum level of 80 I doubt that
kaluchkin @ 2011-05-29 14:22
wtf lvl req is 80..... 49 nt dreams about this nano...
Post a comment
You are not logged in. Anonymous users can not post comments.Please log in to continue.

BatMUD