Xira @ 2007-10-17 19:09
48 more damage never hurts
|
Dollcet @ 2007-10-27 20:28
For the nanoskills required this is a bad joke and it benefits only Fire Dmg , should have made a boost to all dmg-types or simply add some MA-skill via something like "improved 4 fist of kali" . Either FC is smoking some bad stuff or they just dont care at all what MA�s want.
|
paraing @ 2007-10-31 01:31
well the baddest joke wonder if they think its green stats we have on that ?
|
Xyphos @ 2007-11-06 03:19
User Cyberdeck & 6
WTF? MA's don't have Cyberdecks...
FC *WAS* smoking some bad shit...
|
Worldnuker @ 2007-11-06 19:29
Level to 220 and try it instead of whining like twats? Im sure FC would test it before they put it on, they arent ****ing stupid, they made the game ffs
|
Joxer @ 2007-11-10 22:40
why would they bother adding ALL damage types to a nano that changes your damage type to FIRE, only reason they have melee damage on it is because brawl is melee dmg and it doesn't change type
|
Worldnuker @ 2007-11-12 00:39
Xyphos try reading the other nanos. It doesnt mean wear cyberdeck its a bug, its odvious, seriously you thought it was genuine? Its a description bug.
|
Ebag333 @ 2007-11-12 09:51
Actually, it's not. :)
All professions will have their own cyberdeck, that allows them to use 4 new nanos. The cyberdeck will take up a HUD/Util slot (not a weapon slot).
|
Worldnuker @ 2007-11-14 15:47
Ooh...Can you hotswap it out? Or do you have to wear it for the duration of the nano? Eg, can you put it on, buff, take it off?
|
Xyphos @ 2007-11-15 00:45
ok, so has anyone found this yet? where?
|
Worldnuker @ 2007-11-25 21:32
Its coming in a future patch i think, noone seems to have the new decks yet
|
dougflutie @ 2007-12-18 08:15
we got the decks. this nano didn't make the cuts. we got the melee one instead it seems.
@ Worldnuker
yes you can hotswap it, no you don't need it for the duration of the nano, but yes you need it on to cast them.
|
Worldnuker @ 2007-12-30 00:38
Melee? It better make a fiery effect or i will be pissed off, thats why MAs are sexy, like a stone colored flame lol
|
KDawg @ 2008-01-06 19:17
Would be nice if it actually overrode damage type to melee.
Oh, and if it was actually self castable without swapping on a set of arithmetic.
|
0000 @ 2008-01-21 19:38
WTB knowing how much a decent 220 ma with maxed research would have for BM/SI.
|
Salamande @ 2008-01-28 00:06
1786 BM / 1829 SI self.
|
Razvann @ 2008-02-01 11:54
This nano is quite good and i tell you why i was using fire fist buff like every nub ma but i started think for a second all perks are melee so if you wanna do pvp you gotta use melee it will rape a cocoon in a few seconds so very good against engi enfo adventurer keeper and so on who use coon but this is imposible to cast unless you wanna be a useless gimp .So i stay on melee from now on.
|
Vgman @ 2008-02-14 04:39
exacly but your ma attacks (blessed with thunder/upon a wave of sumerr ect) have a higher chance of actually hitting in pvp, i dont normaly hit people with perks in tl5 bs so i normaly go energy fists cause it stacks with thunders dmg.
|
Vgman @ 2008-02-15 16:31
one more thing... would love to see a crit chance buff on this line :P
|
Xenon @ 2008-04-20 13:35
Would be nice if they added "User Change Damage type Melee AC" to it for some pvm epeen. :P
|
Aurielle @ 2008-07-07 02:08
Not just pvm either, would override dmg type on your bow for pvp. Ridiculous nanoskills to cast this, total waste of db space.
|
legionofone @ 2008-10-07 10:53
Trash without lower requirements and dmg override
|
lonewolf2k7 @ 2008-10-08 15:18
FC are stupid roflmao
|
taipan @ 2010-10-17 11:14
wtf they are thinking?
|
| Post a comment |
|
You are not logged in. Anonymous users can not post comments.Please log in to continue. |
