Jharda @ 2005-05-26 09:14
Is the QL300 Type 880 better or the 112?
|
Tuanz @ 2005-06-18 13:44
112, this req Parry and Rispote wich is a waste of IP
|
olezero @ 2005-08-17 14:11
aand, 112 got brawl. But 880 is a cheaper way b4 getting the ql300 one. Atleast for keepers, since we have pretty good Parry/Riposte buffs :)
|
Jeff120 @ 2005-09-28 23:36
how can i twink this into a lvl 210 enf?
|
exhaze @ 2005-11-10 12:21
jobe-made bladestaff, champion of heavy infantry 10, reaver 10, heavy bracer, silken legchopper gloves, sanguisugent armor pieces for all but the hands, and some trickledown should do it :P
|
Skilfngr1 @ 2006-04-17 04:50
I heard on the type 112 that brawl sucks, but I guess every little bit of damage helps. As Olezero says, cheaper and as a keeper can buff rip/parry easy, but havent decided if the brawl is worth it, but I have a ways to go for the ql300.
|
Yakobo66 @ 2006-07-22 18:43
hehe some kepeer was messing aroun ToTW with a 112 and smaked them for 4k brawl :P
|
Venderim @ 2006-11-29 12:59
Afaik brawl damage has nothing to do with the weapon you equip, brawl has its own damage template with a very large damage spread. So you can hit really low ones and really high ones, but a 4k brawl from a level 60 toon I find hard to believe (assuming you aren't meaning some high level hanging outside).
|
gergiskoo @ 2008-09-02 22:50
wow this sucks. 112 > this.
brawl is always good, even if it sucks. if you know what i mean.
|
Post a comment |
You are not logged in. Anonymous users can not post comments.Please log in to continue. |