Auno.org: 18.8.62 | Live servers: 18.8.62

Item Database - Notum Overflow

Notum Overflow Icon #38984 You have been made more vulnerable to nano-based attacks by a Notum Overflow attack.
Flags Modified Description, Default Target, Item Texture Override, Buff Nano, Want Collision
Patch 15.0.1 17.6 17.7.1
NCU 999
Nanocost 0
School Combat: 664
Duration 1 minute
Range 1 m
Effect icon Icon 39500
Stacking order 1
Effects
On Use User Modify Nano vulnerability 15  
Comments
Siaynoque @ 2006-06-23 15:51
Anybody could explain me what "Nano vulnerability" means? :)
Rapt0r @ 2006-08-29 19:45
nano attacks land easier on you?
Ilikebunnies @ 2006-12-30 19:44
Nope that would be:
On Use User Modify Nano resist -800
which is what "Stop notum flow" does (same perk line, earlier)
This one I assume increases dmg by 15% or something.. the first one's much better imho, but if you nuke a lot, maybe both together would be sweet.
Shadow.ik @ 2007-03-30 17:48
Use User Modify Nano vulnerability 15
Mean 15% lower dmg from Nano Attacks/perks
Ilikebunnies @ 2007-05-06 21:32
*higher, not lower
Lower would make no sense.. and look at the description.
Ephyon @ 2007-11-26 04:47
im more interesting on what User Modify Stamina 15000 does ^^
Threeze @ 2007-12-13 15:31
oh. my. god. So this is the "serious exploit" they were talking about regarding Notum overflow perkline...

ugh i can't believe i missed out -_-'
Ephyon @ 2007-12-13 16:35
Wouldnt call it a exploit altho, since FC must have added the stats to it.
Artyomis @ 2007-12-13 16:48
Well, they're closing it now, so i think it was a sploit for sure
Artyomis @ 2007-12-13 16:50
And btw, since this is lvl210 - then i think a few lvl170 twinks could have smth really insane installed :)
As example - lvl170 soljas with ofab back or smth o.O
Dalek @ 2007-12-13 18:31
It wasn't an exploit, it was a bug. Big difference.

I missed out also :( Imagine the MC trickle my NT would have had.
Whitey @ 2007-12-19 14:41
aha you all missed out.

this is gone now? it was around for about a month untouched :P

did some maths with it. Docs could have got Dshark on, lvl 169-174 enfs could get special edition on... endless possibilities.

anyway good riddance it woulda spoiled the game tbh.
Yakobo66 @ 2008-01-30 14:58
could have? at least a couple of docs that had/have dshark on thanks to this... just a shame i found out after it was fixed :(
Yakobo66 @ 2008-01-30 14:58
*wonders WHY FC added 15k stam in 17.6...*
eaze @ 2008-12-21 20:14
Actually, a bug and an exploit is the exact same thing, so no, not big difference. A shame they fixed it tho :(
Ilikebunnies @ 2009-01-03 05:25
A bug is only an exploit when you use it, IE purposefully using a bug = an exploit.
Ats @ 2009-03-11 09:49
it was a bug that was being exploited.

/close thread
Post a comment
You are not logged in. Anonymous users can not post comments.Please log in to continue.